Consulting
Apply the loop to consequential decisions, target architecture and governed transformation trajectories.
Explore consultingExperiatech proprietary framework
AI can compress research, expose alternatives and accelerate the path from an executive question to an executable decision. But speed without architecture only produces decisions that fail faster. Experiatech combines a six-stage amplification loop with a five-dimension maturity model so that increased capacity remains explainable, governed and operational.
Execution method
AI increases strategic capacity when it strengthens an accountable decision system—not when it generates more documents. Evidence moves forward through six stages; observed outcomes return to improve the next decision.
Name the consequential decision, accountable owner, constraints, time horizon and acceptable transfer of risk.
Decision charter · constraints · authority
Structure evidence, entities, relationships, assumptions and credible competing scenarios before asking a model for an answer.
Evidence map · semantic model · scenarios
Use AI and domain expertise to surface contradictions, missing evidence, failure modes and second-order effects.
Assumption register · counterfactuals · gaps
Keep human authority explicit and record the evidence, confidence, trade-offs and dissent behind the decision.
Decision record · confidence · trade-offs
Translate intent into target architecture, controls, roadmaps, responsibilities and bounded automation.
Target state · controls · owned roadmap
Compare expected and observed outcomes, update governed knowledge and feed evidence into the next cycle.
Outcome signals · variance · knowledge updates
Experiatech 5D AI Strategy Framework
The capabilities required to operate AI strategically do not contribute equal value. The most visible skill—prompting—is also the one most rapidly absorbed by products and models.
The Experiatech 5D AI Strategy Framework was developed by Franck Nganiet Sandreau to distinguish volatile technical fluency from durable enterprise capability.
Very high coefficient
Frames opportunity, total cost, data representativeness and risk transfer before technology selection.
Can the organisation explain when AI should not be used?
Low coefficient
Expresses intent through instructions, tools and evaluation criteria, but depreciates as interfaces improve.
Would the capability survive a change of model or interface?
High coefficient
Connects governed data, identity, semantic context, production workflows and observable operations.
Can the system trace its sources, controls and downstream effects?
Very high coefficient
Tests truth through verification, confidence, known failure modes, escalation and reproducible evidence.
Can a domain expert challenge and reproduce the result?
System-level coefficient
Redesigns the value chain through governed feedback, knowledge improvement and explicit boundaries for algorithmic management.
Does the operating model learn without dissolving human authority?
Progress is not a catalogue of tools. It is a transfer of capability—from consuming fluent outputs to designing an evidence-bearing system that can challenge, act and learn.
Uses AI as a conversational search engine.
Access
Grafts generated output onto an unchanged process.
Convenience
Optimises the interface and mistakes fluency for reliability.
Technical fluency
Structures sources, evaluations and human review around a real workflow.
Controlled practice
Models entities, relationships, provenance and temporal context.
Knowledge architecture
Governs permissions, behaviour, evidence and escalation across bounded agents.
Operational system
Uses AI to redesign decisions, capability and risk across the value chain.
Systemic leverage
Field method
Choose one consequential decision and identify five to seven entities whose relationships are necessary to explain it. Add provenance, temporal validity, ownership, preconditions and prohibited actions before expanding scope.
The result is not an immaculate ontology. It is enough governed structure for AI-assisted reasoning to be inspected, challenged and improved.
Product
System
Incident
Role
Region
Decision
Control
10×
The diagnostic establishes a baseline and selects the measures that expose real leverage. Acceleration is valuable only where accountability and control remain intact.
Apply the loop to consequential decisions, target architecture and governed transformation trajectories.
Explore consultingBuild the judgment and reusable methods leadership and technical teams need to run the system themselves.
Explore trainingIncrease operational capacity while producing traceable evidence for the Challenge and Learn stages.
Explore agentsStart with one consequential decision. We will identify the evidence, capability gaps and measures required for a bounded strategic-capacity diagnostic.